This site runs best with JavaScript enabled.

A Brief History of the Digital Garden

Last tended on June 09, 2020
🌱 Seedling

Back in April I put up a long twitter thread on the emerging trend of Digital Gardening. It gathered a little buzz, and made clear we're in a moment where there is something culturally compelling about this concept.

The term is not new.

It's been floating around for over two decades. Though it's passed through a couple of semantic shifts - meaning different things to different people across the years. As words tend to do.

Tracing back how Neologisms are born and evolve helps us understand why we needed the word in the first place. A game I am very here for.

The History

The earliest mention of digital gardening I've found at least partially aligns with the way we're currently using it. Mark Bernstein's 1998 essay Hypertext Gardens is a true-to-form original manifesto.

Let's also note Mark's graphics are to die for

This whole artefact is a beautiful reflection on nature of links, the balance of chaos and structure, and a call to embrace free-wheeling web exploration.

It was part of a larger metaphorical conversation happening throughout the nineties around hypertext. The promise of The Web was a labyrinth-esque landscape tended by WikiGardeners and WikiGnomes – the caretakers cleaning up broken links, attributions, and awkward white space.

While it's mostly a manifesto about the user experience flow, content organisation, and the early web debates over The Navigation Problem, the core ethos feels aligned with our emerging understanding of digital gardening.

"Unplanned hypertext sprawl is wilderness: complex and interesting, but uninviting. Interesting things await us in the thickets, but we may be reluctant to plough through the brush, subject to thorns and mosquitoes"

After Mark's essay the term digital gardening goes quiet for nearly a decade. Until Twitter...

In April of 2007 when Tweets first started ringing through the internet airwaves, Rory Sutherland (oddly, the vice president of Ogilvy Group) used the term and defined it as "faffing about syncing things, defragging - like pruning for young people" For those from outside the Commonwealth, "faffing" means mucking about without a clear direction or useful output

The next dozen mentions on Twitter all followed this sentiment – people were using the term as a way to describe digital maintenance - cleaning up one's digital space in general.

The focus was on sorting, weeding, pruning, and decluttering, rather than growing and cultivating. People mentioned private folders, codebases, and photo albums as the focus of their gardening efforts. Whereas now we're mainly talking about public notes and wikis.

These people were digital puttering more than gardening.

At the 2015 Digital Learning Research Network, Mike Caufield – an xxx – delivers a keynote on The Garden and the Stream: a Technopastoral

This later becomes a hefty essay that lays the foundations for our modern understanding of the word.


Coming Soon

Feel free to bug me on twitter to finish writing this.
Want to share?

Join the newsletter

For weekly notes on visual thinking, ethical technology, and cultural anthropology.

Maggie Appleton © 2020